President Donald Trump has reversed course on his controversial television advertising blitz, announcing on Monday that he will no longer use taxpayer money to fund a series of campaign-style ads promoting him — and will instead pay for them with money raised for MAGA Inc, the pro-Trump super PAC. The about-face follows days of criticism from both Democrats and Republicans over the multimillion-dollar taxpayer-funded effort, which the White House had defended as public service announcements.
The announcement on Truth Social
Trump broke the news in a post on his social media platform, framing the ads as "a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A." and blaming his critics for the controversy.
"The Radical Left is upset with the fact that I am taking Ads, which I consider to be a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A., and paying for them with U.S.A. money. This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Trump wrote (CNN).
The White House confirmed the shift on Monday night, saying MAGA Inc will pay for such ads going forward. It did not answer questions about how it or Trump would prove that political funds — rather than public money — were being used on future advertising, or whether taxpayers would be reimbursed for ads that already aired (Reuters via BNC).
How much the ads cost
The price tag on the taxpayer-funded campaign has grown as reporting has come in. Early estimates put federal spending at more than $440,000; by late September, AdImpact, the leading political ad-tracking firm, counted at least $1.4 million in taxpayer-funded airtime, while CNN described the whole effort as a multimillion-dollar push and TheWrap put taxpayer-funded airtime since September at more than $10 million (The Statesman).
The funding came through a $20 million Department of Homeland Security contract awarded to LMD Agency for a national media campaign beginning September 20, according to CBS News contracting records. The spots aired widely — on Fox News, Newsmax, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MS NOW and during NFL and college football games — and each carried a disclaimer stating it was "Paid for by the U.S. Government" (Culture.org).
CNN obtained 12 of the ads, ranging from 15 seconds to three minutes. One spot, "King of the Jungle," intersperses images of Trump, campaign rallies, lions and eagles. Another, "Resilience," traces Trump's progression from a younger man in the New York real estate market to the presidency. Unaired spots include three highlighting the US military and operations in Iran and Venezuela, one titled "God Made Trump," and another recapping a UFC fight Trump hosted at the White House (CNN).
One ad described by Reuters features Trump declaring that America will never be a communist country while a chorus repeats the words "love me"; another pairs images of Mount Rushmore with footage of Trump praising a "golden age of America," while a third recounts the US capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro (Reuters via BNC).
Why the backlash
Ethics experts and lawmakers from both parties have questioned the ads, with critics calling them a possible violation of federal laws barring the use of taxpayer funds for "publicity or propaganda purposes." Democrats said last month that one of the commercials closely resembled an advertisement from Trump's 2024 presidential campaign — a charge that stung particularly hard with November's congressional midterms weeks away (Business Standard).
California Attorney General Rob Bonta on Monday called for an independent investigation, describing the spending as "a staggering misuse of public funding and breach of public trust" (Reuters via BNC).
Trump offered no details on how the funding switch will work in practice, and said nothing about reimbursing taxpayers for ads that already aired — leaving the central question of the controversy unresolved even as the bill moves to his political war chest, which had amassed more than $400 million by the end of July (Business Standard).
The reversal lands amid a politically charged week for the White House: only on Monday did Trump approve the first military execution in the United States since 1961, while the administration has also reached out to Russia over a plague outbreak.
Table of Contents
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Trump announce about the taxpayer-funded ads?
On Monday, October 5, Trump announced on Truth Social that he will stop using taxpayer money for a series of promotional TV ads and will instead pay for the "Patriotic Ads" himself, using money raised for MAGA Inc, his pro-Trump super PAC. The White House confirmed the PAC will cover such ads going forward.
How much taxpayer money was spent on the ads?
Estimates vary: AdImpact counted at least $1.4 million by late September, while TheWrap put taxpayer-funded airtime since September at more than $10 million. The ads were funded through a $20 million Department of Homeland Security contract with LMD Agency for a national media campaign starting September 20.
What was in the ads?
At least 13 campaign-style spots were created, including "King of the Jungle" (Trump, campaign rallies, lions and eagles), "Resilience" (Trump's biography), a spot where Trump says America will never be a communist country as a chorus repeats "love me," one pairing Mount Rushmore with footage of Trump, and one recounting the US capture of Nicolás Maduro. Unaired spots include ads on US military operations in Iran and Venezuela, "God Made Trump," and one on a UFC fight hosted at the White House.
Will taxpayers be reimbursed for ads that already aired?
Trump gave no details on reimbursement for already-aired ads, nor on how he would prove that political funds are used for future advertising. The White House likewise did not answer those questions.
Why did the ads draw criticism?
Lawmakers from both parties and ethics experts questioned whether taxpayer money was improperly used for ads promoting Trump politically, possibly violating federal rules against using public funds for "publicity or propaganda purposes." Democrats noted one ad closely resembled a 2024 Trump campaign spot, and the ads aired during the campaign for November's midterm elections.
